End of Gospel

WARNING: This is a very rough preliminary draft! Many things here may be wrong.

I am not so weary in this bad weather which is here now that I have no more power to write. Let I now will publish this rough draft as it is for the world to see, and let it happen whatever should happen. This draft is yet in a broken state and need to be corrected and hard to read. But this seems just too big news to wait anymore.

It is written in New Testament (Ro. 10:4) Christ is the end of the law. This implies that every law has its end. So, New Testament (Gospel) itself also has its end, accordingly itself.

What I do not say

Christ has come by mistake (2Cor. 5:21)

Christ has come to us and was sacrificed for us by mistake. This statement is not my invention, it is written in Bible: (2Cor. 5:21) For him who knew no sin he made to be sin on our behalf; so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. Christ never was making any mistakes. But His coming was by mistake. The entire life of Jesus Christ was a big mistake.

The word sin means a mistake, or literally translated, to miss the mark, to hit missing away the target.

In simple words: Christ has come to a wrong planet. It was not His mistake as He never mistakes, but His driver has mistaken and driven Him to a wrong planet. The driver has missed the target of the travel. For us saved by Christ this was good, but this was not good in general. Gospel plainly tells that we are saved by grace, that is saved incidentally as a result of a mistake which was a mistake but good for us. Christ had more important deals than to save us, but His driver has mistaken. We were reading in New Testament that we are saved by grace that is incidentally not by us being worth of salvation, but were not understanding this before.

However not only the earthy life of Jesus Christ was a mistake. It is written (2Cor. 5:20-21) (20 Christ... 21 ... him who knew no sin he made to be sin on our behalf...). That is Christ was made sin. This means that the entire life of Christ in this world (not only on the Earth) was a mistake. That is all what has happened with Him in the World was a mistake. We had just an incidental success (grace) but anybody else also had the same, incidental success. For anybody taken separately salvation is just an incidence good for him but missing for other, however the entire system of salvation is indeed needed.

Jesus Christ was speaking not from himself

(Jn. 14:10, 24) 10 ... The words that I tell you, I speak not from myself; but the Father who lives in me does his works... 24 ... The word which you hear isn't mine, but the Father's who sent me.

Jesus Christ was saying that He speaks not from Himself. We were not realizing what this means despite of it is very simple, He was just saying not what He wanted to say. He was bound by certain legal obligations and was not able to say what He wanted to say. All what He has said was a truth but not that truth which it should be. Now I say you a truth regarding this.

Here it is also said that Christ is sent, that is accomplishes a particular formal mission. He is not at a free walk where one would speak anything he want to say.

A reader could respond: Yes, He was speaking not from Himself but it is plainly told here that He was speaking from the Father, so His words were indeed the words of God to us.

He indeed has said not in vain that He spoke not from Himself. It was meaning somethings. He has emphasized that He speaks not from Himself. And what it means? It means that He was speaking not free accordingly the situation, but by a prepared pattern. You would met with a great teacher or a great speaker, but if he would just read a studybook, he would be no different in anything compared with a lesser teacher. It is exactly what I say, Christ teaches not from Himself but by studybook, by pattern. It was not an individual lesson specifically prepared for us, as we are not worth this, but just the standard lesson.

We have not yet really spoke with Christ! We have spoke with an official not a person. Essentially we have spoken with a common official of the Space Empire not reached the highest level. Just any official would say the same words, so this does not matter that it was Jesus Christ Himself, it was just like a common official.

So we have overweighted the importance of the visit of Christ. A great teacher has come but all what He did was that He just read us from a studybook, just like as any other (lower rank) teacher would do. Nothing special has happened, we were simply over-impressed by the words that Christ has come.

We are not under Gospel now

The story told by Gospel is that the ancient Jews were in their time under the Law of God and Old Covenant (Old Testament). But once the time of the law has passed when the Jesus Christ, the Messiah has come, and then believers started to justify themselves by faith independently of the law (Ro. 3:28) We maintain therefore that a man is justified by faith apart from the works of the law. So, accordingly Gospel, the Law has become not needed and has become a history, just a teaching example for us now, not a law accordingly which we live: (Ro. 6:14) For sin will not have dominion over you. For you are not under law, but under grace.

It is clear that this should somehow apply to any law and even to the Gospel itself. But before it was not understood how it should be applied to Gospel. For example, personally I before was supposing that regarding the Gospel itself it means just raising from Gospel to a new level of Gospel itself. But now I know how we should deal away with Gospel. Now this is clear.

What I say is:

We are not under Gospel anymore, and what Gospel says is now not said to us. That is God speaks in Gospel to others but not to us.

(Ro. 3:19) Now we know that whatever things the law says, it speaks to those who are under the law...

This is just like as that after the end of the Old Testament what God speaks in the book to the Jewish nation continues to be important, knowledgeable, insightful, etc., but it is not spoken to us, it was spoken to them (Old Covenant Jews), not to us.

Stages of Covenants with God

Stages of development of the covenants with God:

Old Testament
Angels searching for a way to save people from sin.
New Testament
God calls not existing as existing, unsaved people as saved. Good news (Gospel) is teaching of calling anything good, even bad things. Wonderfully this is a solution. Called out salvation works in practice, e.g. sick become healthy, thieves start to work, etc.
After New Testament
We need to realize that New Testament itself has become a problem and we should somehow get rid of some things of New Testament. Calling anything good prevents us to speak about problems and many problems lie unsolved.

I deem that the motto of Next Stage should be Anything here is bad. It does not mean that it was bad. What has happened is good as God was acting in His glory. But it may be better. It is bad compared with how good it could be.

I deem that at this stage we should realize that we people are sick. But it is not a bad news. I tell you nothing new bad. Anybody of you already knows that we cannot raise much more that some hundreds kilograms, cannot run 500 km/hour, calculate by brains like supercomputers, and do other things which healthy people can do. So when I tell you We are sick I indeed tell you a good news, not a bad news, because it implies that it may be better. (Ro. 3:31) Do we then nullify the law through faith? May it never be! No, we establish the law. Likewise, we do not nullify Gospel but we affirm Gospel, that is good news.

Now what I teach is a little above Gospel. I myself not so high to reach even a little part of Gospel. But I stay on the Gospel, so in this sense I am a little above. (Likewise Isaac Newton was saying that he is so high because he stays on shoulders of giants.)

IssueOld TestamentGospelAfter Gospel
Appropriate motto It is bad. It is indeed good. It could be better. Now it is bad.
What controls our behavior Following rules without understanding what they are for. Attempt to understand, knowledge. Realization that our past rules and knowledge were wrong.
People are good or bad? People are bad Humility, God's saving glory, presence of God with people; people surpass angels accordingly Gospel Humility turned out to be pride in madness. Glory is everywhere and we do not surpass in it.
Salvation No technology of salvation yet. Grace. God wants all people to be saved. (1Tim. 2:3-4) 3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior; who desires all people to be saved and come to full knowledge of the truth. (1Tim. 2:3-4) 3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior; who desires all people to be saved and come to full knowledge of the truth. Many people received salvation by grace, but not many of them were studying mathematical logic. Many idiots are a problem on the heaven. A good news was that heaven was able (easily enough) to accept all of them indeed and found for them a good place.
Authority of men Men are subordinate to angels The future age is given not to angels but to men. (It is proved to be right by the humility wisdom.) It is clear that if any man controls angels then he himself is controlled. He appears to be an intermediary without real authority.
Punishment of sinners Sinners must be punished. Grace makes believing Gospel sinners unpunished. Condemned is our past life under the authority of god of this world (see below). It means that it ceases freeing place for new life (which will have these who accept it).

The essence of the Testaments is: A scholar solves a problem. He cannot solve it (Old Testament). Somebody comes and helps him (New Testament). Now the solution is right. Yep, it was not that problem which should be solved.

Death for Gospel

(Gal. 2:19-21) 19 For I, through the law, died to the law, that I might live to God. 20 I have been crucified with Christ, and it is no longer I that live, but Christ living in me. That life which I now live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself up for me. 21 I don't make void the grace of God. For if righteousness is through the law, then Christ died for nothing! For the past stage the law was meaning Gospel. That is for us it means that through Gospel we died to Gospel. In the time when we were living accordingly Gospel we were living for ourselves not for God. We were following selfish desire to be unpunished. (However some were following it from the reasoning that God wants this.) Now being free of Gospel, we can live for God. Before we were counting that we live eternal life accordingly Gospel. Now I do not count so anymore but instead I count that Christ who is in me lives eternal life instead of me. He is saved instead of me, it is what I need because He is anyway saved better than I would be saved.

Accordingly (Ro. 10:4) Christ is the end of the law, we reach contact with Christ when we cease to live by law. Now it means for us to cease to live by Gospel. Then we will reach revelation of Christ.

Failures of life accordingly Gospel

Here is an example of a problem appeared during life accordingly Gospel. Being (in my own understanding) a great mathematician, I counted that people should kinda stay on their knees before me, serve me. So everybody who I was meeting was made severely blamed for his doing even a little bad to me or not doing good. But Gospel is the ministry of justification (not ministry of good as was Old Testament). So my life was contrary to Gospel as I was making everybody I met blamed not justified. What I have reached is kinda absurd, the more good I do the worse it is. Every time when a bad man meets with a good man it is bad, because a bad man should serve good man but he does not. So we have concluded that to be a good man is bad because it causes others to be guilty.

That we have advocates is good. We cannot live without advocates. But when a good advocate saves a bad person from prison, it is not the best.

From the very beginning into Gospel were laid some mines: I have already said about (Ro. 10:4) Christ is the end of law and (Gal. 2:19) ... I, through the law, died to the law... as well as Jn. 14:10, 24. There are some other also.

Now I think that we were lowest people who have chosen the most wrong way. Indeed we were the most important as we were preventing others to be in our place.

Why we Christians were tortured so much? Isn't it for the good purpose to cause us to somehow deviate from the set way of faith and to guess that thing which I guessed and write here? What else can be done to teach somebody to which it is impossible to speak except of to somehow torture him in the hope that incidentally he will deviate from his normal way and guess?

God of this world has blinded them... God of this world means God limited to the means and rules of this world. Now we see exactly this that despite of Gospel is true and right we were blinded by that spirit (God of this world) which has set our minds that we should be limited by the Gospel.

Now I deem that being justified, we indeed should behave as not justified, remembering however that we are justified to not fall into complete self-condemnation.

Probably St. Paul was also knowing the mystery. (1Cor. 1:21) For seeing that in the wisdom of God, the world through its wisdom didn't know God, it was God's good pleasure through the foolishness of the preaching to save those who believe. Here Paul says that our preaching was foolish. It was a foolish deal to preach.

(1Cor. 1:18) For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are dying, but to us who are saved it is the power of God. Oh, who was dying on the cross? It was Christ. For Him what was considered by us as the power of God (the word of cross) was simply a stupidness. It was looking like wise only from our side.

Apostle as a bad Thing

So what I say you is that I was an apostle, yes, a real apostle not a false apostle. But broken I was made worse than a prostitute or a criminal. It was not good that I was an apostle.

(1Cor 4:4) For I know nothing against myself. Yet I am not justified by this, but he who judges me is the Lord. St. Paul was not knowing what God punishes him for (see below).

(1Cor 4:5) Therefore judge nothing before the time, until the Lord comes, who will both bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and reveal the counsels of the hearts. Then each man will get his praise from God. Now these before not understandable (hidden in darkness things) are revealed. Now we can understand (judge) our past failures.

(1Cor 4:9) For, I think that God has displayed us, the apostles, last of all, like men sentenced to death. For we are made a spectacle to the world, both to angels and men. Lo! Apostles are the last not the first as we have used to thought quite contrary to said in Gospel. Last of all, this means after prostitutes, thieves. murderers, homosexuals, Hitler, Stalin, the last, the worst. We were think that Paul, Peter and the rest apostles were among the first men. No, Gospel says that they are among the last. The punishment for being an apostle is death. So Gospel tells.

(1Cor. 4:10) We are fools for Christ's sake, but you are wise in Christ. We are weak, but you are strong. You have honor, but we have dishonor. Apostles was fools not wise man. To become an apostle and to work as an apostle is a stupid thing.

In the following verses Gospel tells the due just punishment for the sin of being an apostle:

(1Cor. 4:11-13) 11 Even to this present hour we hunger, thirst, are naked, are beaten, and have no certain dwelling place. 12 We toil, working with our own hands. When people curse us, we bless. Being persecuted, we endure. 13 Being defamed, we entreat. We are made as the filth of the world, the dirt wiped off by all, even until now.

Compare also (2Cor 6:4-5) 4 but in everything commending ourselves, as servants of God, in great endurance, in afflictions, in hardships, in distresses, 5 in beatings, in imprisonments, in riots, in labors, in watchings, in fastings. What it says about? It says about slaves. But now we are not for any slavery anymore, we are to free all slaves even slaves of God.

(Oh, well, now I am not an apostle (this word means sent with a mission) anymore. I write this article by my own initiative not by the will of God.)

Now I want to return to be a mathematician, not attempting to be an apostle anymore. I will indeed sometimes write about some interesting facts from Bible.

Again I repeat that in the past I was a real apostle, just like the twelve or Paul. Now I am probably the first apostle who has repented that he was an apostle.

Many people wanted that religious fanatics would repent, but you'd not wanted that apostles would repent that they are apostles, yes? But God did that this has indeed happened.

Beforehand I was wondering why in Old Testament the same Hebrew word is used to denote a saint and a (male) prostitute. Now I understand this, simply because these two are equally bad.

What then apostles are for? We were to be a bad example for the dealers of this world so that they would laugh after us and do not do like we, see (1Cor. 4:9) For, I think that God has displayed us, the apostles, last of all, like men sentenced to death. For we are made a spectacle to the world, both to angels and men.

Failure of angels

The word Gospel in Greek (EVANGELION) has common root with the word angel. Based on this Gospel can be also translated like being angel well, correct life of angels, correct rules of behavior for angels or something like this. So the end of gospel means that the behavior of angels ceased to be well, that angels started to misbehave.

Not only people-Christians but also angels were attempting to live accordingly Gospel. As I have shown above, the attempt to be ministers of Gospel was silly. As a result not only people but also angels were living in a silly way. As during time the church was developed and becoming more advanced, Christians actions were becoming more silly. Obviously angels were advancing greater and more successfully that people, so actions of angels were becoming sillier faster than actions of people. As a result in our time angels have reached about the same degree of silliness as people. That is now angels are essentially as silly as people.

For me it was a self-obvious thing that an angel or a angel surpasses a man so much that a man would have no hope to reach a level compared with that. But as angels have also become silly, now it has happened indeed that people are on a level of development which is near to the level of angels. That is now angels have reached such a degree of silliness that take the decision to actually count themselves equal with people.

As a result we can reasonably count all equal on the next stage.

Inherent problems with Gospel

Here are also some examples of how attempting to minister Gospel leads to nonsense:

(Before I was unable to think this way (to accommodate this into my mental model) as I was considering people as inherently unequal with higher levels of angels, angels, galaxies.)

I continue to believe that all what was said in the Bible are historic facts. But now for me these have become namely historic facts. Great History with heavenly powers coming to the Earth but just a history, the past.

Here I will demonstrate some silly, meaningless situations where I have fallen attempting to live accordingly Gospel.

The Old Testament has come to the end, what was so to say confirmed by destruction of Jerusalem temple in 70 year A.C. In New Testament the temple is our bodies. And we should remember that our bodies are liable to destruction. So destruction of our bodies is the end Gospel. The Gospel itself say that (Ro. 7:1) Or don't you know, brothers (for I speak to men who know the law), that the law has dominion over a man for as long as he lives?.

Silly situations

When I was a teenager, the aged were severely punishing me for faith of Christ and for my godly life (for refusal of sex with every girl, for example). The punishments were including damaging my head and other kinds of tortures which were making me mad. Then, driven mad, would I not go to have sex with a dog? Wouldn't it better to have sex with the girl with which they were commanding me to have sex? Wouldn't it better to deny Christ by words than being driven mad lose memory and really forget him or even to change to pray to Devil? [TODO: This should be below Materialism section, which is now commented out.]

This is what was leading my life accordingly Gospel. Now it is evident that it is useless and even harmful to attempt to live accordingly Gospel.

Gospel was inappropriate from the very beginning. Yet St. Paul was beaten and driven mad. But either St. Paul has not understood that Gospel has the end, accordingly Gospel itself, or rather he has kept this in secret (so it seems from the verse Eph. 6:19). But anyway, until now we were holding Gospel despite of it was having no sense for use to attempt to hold it.

Now I am conscious that I have realized that the driver of Christ has missed the target, come to a wrong planet, and all this was a big mistake, after being long time greatly confused attempting to find a sense in some of acts of Christ (who as I know never mistakes and every His acts has a sense) which as I now understand were meaningless.

I was repeatedly put in silly situations like this: I was in lowest rank in a church organization. They would not only not allow me to preach them, but even were not speaking with me. The pastor was despising me. So I was finding no occasion how I could call them (both the pastor and others) to the true faith and repentance and save them. And all what would be enough to change all this, to be respected by the pastor, allowed to preach and take a high position would be to have sex with the wife of the pastor (which has offered it me). I was completely messed in mind thinking about situations like this. Suppose I would do this (I have not.), but if I would do what it would be? A kind of prostitution. Then who I would be after this? I would be an apostle prostitute. Yes, there was a reason to not do this, it is that I was simply not able to analyze this situation, I have been somehow able to analyze apostles and to analyze prostitutes, but I would be not able to analyze anything about anyone both apostle and prostitute. An airplane may crash because of a damage or fuel going out. But it may also crash by the other reason, lost orientation (where I am), this would be lost orientation and so also a crash.

Now I understand that I was put in these situations by God in order for me to understand that I cannot hold Gospel and it makes no sense to attempt to continue to hold it.

Failure of the ministry as the way to the next stage

Now I thank God for all what has happened. I was following my understanding of God's will optimized for evangelical ministry. I was not understanding why God allows them to torture and break me, while otherwise if would not being tortured, I would further develop my knowledge and raise to upper levels of ministry. But we were missing the most important thing in all evangelical ministry, that it was a wrong way accordingly Gospel itself. Gospel is right but ministering Gospel is wrong. Only after complete failure I was dare to think that something may be wrong in evangelical ministry. And I then have thought something which nobody of my circle was thinking, that Gospel indicates its own end.

That is I would otherwise following my understanding of the will of God for me become one more Billy Graham or Kenneth Kouplend, maybe preaching and curing more and greater due surpassing gifts which God has given me (but I have largely lost as a result of tortures and silly life). I was wondering why all these bad things happen with me. But the essence here is that to be like Billy Graham or Kenneth Kouplend or whoever is not a good thing. All we were saying not understanding what we say, we are saved by God's mercy. Now I understand that what was with me what also what was worth for Billy Graham or Kenneth Kouplend, doing wrong deal accordingly a misconcept, but God just had mercy on them. On me however God had greater mercy as He has lead me to realize that it was a misconcept.

Knowledge of truth

As I have said above God wants not just all to be saved but also to reach full knowledge of truth. So having full knowledge of truth (perfect math logic theory) is essential.

Now we have already reached very near to full knowledge of truth, my math logic research is based on infinite formulas, a math theory which can describe not only flesh but even spirit. So we have reached to knowledge of spiritual truth. And it is the first time when we have come near to a perfect formal math theory. It will be probably for us in place of a heavenly revelation being of the same quality.

Anathema

(Gal. 1:6-9) 6 I marvel that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ to a different gospel; 7 and there isn't another gospel. Only there are some who trouble you, and want to pervert the gospel of Christ. 8 But even though we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you any gospel other than that which we preached to you, let him be cursed. 9 As we have said before, so I now say again: if any man preaches to you any gospel other than that which you received, let him be cursed.

Now again in As we have said before, so I now say again in Gal. 1:9 (before here should be now understood as before the end of New Covenant) means that this continues after end of New Testament, that if anyone preaches any gospel different than which we have received then him be under anathema. I however now preach not a different gospel but not a gospel at all. So I deem that this anathema does not fall onto me. But as we have said before, so I now say again I confirm that anyone who preaches any different gospel (which some may count Buddhism, Islam, etc.) he should be under anathema from the church of Christ.

So, accordingly the gospel itself, no other gospel should be preached. It means that after the end of gospel, a gospel (an other gospel) should not be preached again. That is gospel should not be return back, never preached again.

The word anathema may be literally translated as put in the midst to publicitly take note, in our context it may mean publish a note about something or somebody. The word gospel translated literally means good news or more exactly correct news. Gospel is simply the official inter-galaxy space news media channel. Anathema is an ad, banner, special note outside of the main channel. Gospel means the standard news media, anathema means a violation of the standard. Just like as the official paper news media (the news) yield place to the Internet channels, now comes a period of time when Gospel should yield place to the anathema.

An another analogy: In a very barbarian society when anyone becomes famous he has a problem. For example, in many child societies when with anyone happens anything such that he becomes widely known, his clothes would be set on fire, his studybooks stolen, etc. Or when even a little beautiful woman becomes famous, she has great chance to be raped. In a society or higher morality and development to become famous may be not a problem, to be in the news is even reversely counted as a happy occurrence. I suppose that something likewise happened on a higher level where previously anathema (switching publication form the official channel to a special note) was a problem for a man, but now it may become a benefit.

And also personally I was known as a member of a sect (in reality I was first a Baptist, then a Charismatic or like this). And being known as a cultist I was persecuted. How much I would desire to have a kind of anathema to cease from persecutions. And lo now I actually have something like this. Isn't it good?

If somebody will preach to you other... we ourselves or an angel from the heaven, let be anathema It again confirms that St. Paul was knowing the mystery as he was probably going to preach something other. Whose anathema then it should be?

I think that now (especially after Luther) it is good news when one receive such an anathema! He would have a chance to be shown in TV news, etc.

Icons

Now again the direct sense of the word anathema: a thing hanged in a noticeable place in a temple to be seen, to be displayed. An icon (in the Roman Catholic and Russian/Greek Orthodox sense) is an anathema in this sense.

I also suppose (from purely historical, not religious positions) that probably the initial purpose of Christian icons was to display these who are under anathema so that all would know them. I am not sure whether icons really was initially spread with this purpose.

Previously I have compared an anathema with an Internet banner. This is again a near analogy with an icon.

An icon is an anathema. Previously we were sure than an anathema is a bad thing. But now I consider an anathema as a good thing. As a result I am not sure what should be our relation to icons now, in the after Gospel period. So what? Should we now:

I do not know. I however suppose that we probably should to display our photos in noticeable places for all to notice that we are now under anathema. We probably should hang our photos near with ancient icons to display that the ancient saints should be under anathema just like we, signifying such things as that apostles were worse than prostitutes.

Materialism

Humility

When king Nebuchadnezzar as a punishment from God for his pride was for a time made as stupid as an animal, he was probably even not remembering that he was a man in the past time, he was probably remembering only that in the past it was better. But Bible teaches (Ecc. 7:10) Don't say, Why were the former days better than these? For you do not ask wisely about this. So if it was that Nebuchadnezzar was thinking that past was better because before he had wisdom, then that (human) wisdom was not real wisdom. And, yes, afterward, being an animal Nebuchadnezzar understood something important he was not understanding while was a normal king of that age. Nebuchadnezzar story was of Old Testament. In New Testament (Ro. 8:35, 39) 35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Could oppression, or anguish, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? ... 39 nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.; this generalizes the story of Nebuchadnezzar as (Ro. 8:28) We know that all things work together for good for those who love God, to those who are called according to his purpose., that is even Nebuchadnezzar story could be considered as teaching and reaching greater wisdom, as good news.

This is called humility, when outwardly bad circumstances indeed turn out good, make us more near to God. Nebuchadnezzar was humiliated. On the example of Nebuchadnezzar it is shown as state which seems only bad (being an animal) in some aspects surpasses being a man.

New Testament has revealed humility of the Lord Jesus Christ who acting in human form was a little below angels, but indeed was with glory and honor pertaining to God, (He 2:7, 9) 7 You made him a little lower than the angels; You crowned him with glory and honor... 9 But we see him who has been made a little lower than the angels, Jesus, because of the suffering of death crowned with glory and honor, that by the grace of God he should taste of death for everyone. That Jesus was made below angels is somehow analogous to that Nebuchadnezzar was made below people, but in this humiliated state both have reached a result of life with God.

So after the example of Jesus Christ humility was demonstrated as a necessary element of godliness, one of the most important things in the Christian life, and as a good.

But in the last days of New Testament our attempts to be humble was leading either to a failure (being proud) or to becoming like an animal who is nothing in our humility. That is we (at least I) had no real successes in humility except of silly things. Yet we was proud by our humility.

But now this good news is considered as somehow strained. We need better good news than the Gospel because being a mad man long time or all the time does not make sense for us as we do not understand what it may be good for (even despite of some of the greatest geniuses was mad and so madness can be considered as positive). However on the new level it is understood what it may be good for, it is good to be set free from good news (gospel).

As I have said, now we may consider ourselves equal with others and so eliminate the dilemma of humility (being proud by our humility).

So I now consider our past humility as a training to now consider ourselves equal.

Now I think that now we cannot be humble considering ourselves below others, but we can consider ourselves equal with others.

Materialistic concept of mind

Humility is what connects materialism and idealism, adding humility turn materialism into idealism. Reasonably connecting materialism and idealism may seem impossible; it is because humility which reaches God seems impossible, but we know that it is possible because we know that so it was with the man Jesus Christ.

In certain sense the more simply is somebody the more clever (traditional translations of Bible say wise) he is. (I will write more about this in a separate article about humility.)

So in certain sense for example an animal is more clever than a man. (So for example Nebuchadnezzar has understood while being an animal something he was not understanding being a normal man.) In general the less neurones a brain has the more wise it is.

It is because the more simple is a solution of a problem, the more general is this solution. A brain with little quantity of neurones just does not have the ability to follow a complex solution, if it despite of its stupidity finds a solution it is a general (perfect) solution, which sometimes may be more excellent than a solution found by a bigger brain. (However a very big brain could find the better or best solution, but sometimes this very big is really very big such as size of galaxies.)

But this formal statement is very far from the practice. Practically people are more clever than animals which less neurones (e.g. cats). However Bible reveals that lowly are indeed not only more wise with impractical useless wisdom but are also more near to God (what the science misses). This means that humility has its wisdom but anyway this wisdom is very far off from the practice and hardly can be identities with a concrete mind without God, but with God is has a concrete value of being blessed by God.

Because it is far off from the practice but instead even walks away to God and so hardly can be identified it goes far away from our criteria of mind IQ tests, chess game, etc. There far away (near to God) our criteria are meaningless, because there there are no our problems and no need to solve these. As our criteria and our science are meaningless there, we can (are so to say allowed) arbitrarily choose how to continue our description of the events to there, what for example to call good and what to call bad. (We can bad a burst of a car, but can a man say whether a burst of e.g. a star or a galaxy is good or bad, profit or loss?)

Here is a problem: Suppose that the number of neurones in a brain decreases. As it decreases the brain becomes more wise, in general more wise with removal of every neurone. But at the end we would have just one neurone. Is one primitive neurone more clever than the brain? This looks like a nonsense and it seems that something is wrong there. To continue to even more nonsense, if the last left neurone would be removed then where is the wisdom? Shouldn't it become even greater so?

As I have told we can arbitrarily choose the answer to this question. We are allowed to say that yes, so it is much more wise. But where is the wisdom if we have removed all neurones? We are to conclude that it has gone outside of the brain and so we can conclude existence of deathless spirit.

So we have a choice (right) to believe it and to tell stories in such a way. Jesus Christ has chosen to teach this.

So Jesus Christ has taught and idealistic philosophy while materialistic philosophy about human mind would be also true. It depends on how to count.

Or an other example to be more clear: Consider a country and its people level of richness. We could calculate it for the country population becoming greater or smaller. If the population becomes very small it may become a nonsense as the country may become a part of a greater country which could size or control it, and the currency in which richness is calculated may disappear. And when it would reach zero, then the result would be arbitrary (zero dived by zero is an arbitrary number). Jesus Christ has chosen to count that when a population of a country reaches zero people, its people may be indeed considered as rich. Accordingly His teaching these people may be at heaven and be rich there.

All this may seem to be unfounded philosophy, probably formally correct, unrelated with reality.

For a mean man from 20 century scientific background this may look like meaningless fantasy or fiction, but we disciples of Christ know with many practical examples that this mode of mind makes sense.

This very article is an other example: It tells that the author due material hardships (no money, hunger, damaged head, etc.) was a bad evangelical minister, and there were seen no way how this could be considered as a benefit, and not understood how the concept of humility may be integrated into this system; but this article shows that it has finally indeed lead to a surpassing result of evangelical ministry, namely to complete denial of evangelical ministry.

So in Gospel was taught an idealistic concept of human mind which was arbitrarily chosen in such a way to be fit into the scheme of Gospel.

Materialistic concept of mind can be also chosen as an alternative.

Gospel is hard to apply to situations of broken head, madness, very stupidity, etc. So severely broken head is in a sense the end of Gospel. Formally, Gospel is anyway right. But it has lost sense.

Gospel says (1Cor. 15:36) You foolish one, that which you yourself sow is not made alive unless it dies. In the same way our mind here is unrelated with the mind after death except of what happens in our death, the remembrance of our death.

The concrete mind dies, more abstract mind may die later, but remains only the purely abstract mind as an abstraction.

During life accordingly Gospel we were taught many practical aspects of life outside the mechanics of the physical body. For example, we can control movement of clouds with the electromagnetic waves we radiate (just like the HAAPR project but more successfully). When we die of life continues further in the spirit. But it is not what our life is, but (Phlp. 1:21) For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain..

But having such wisdom and powers and being fascinated by such things I unlike normal people was not understanding the simple thing that human mind has a material hardware i.e. brain. I was not understanding and confused seeing that our concrete mind and concrete powers (e.g. the power to control clouds) may be damaged if the brain is damaged. Now I am not confused by this as I understand that despite of every concrete power can be damaged, the mind and the power which is in Christ cannot be damaged.

It is worth note here that New Testament (as well as Old Testament) condemns magic which is as I now understand attaching our life to middle level (wonders and anomalies such as control over clouds) instead of to Christ Himself. Christ is in us, it is like an invisible internal state, not an external appearance such as clouds, stars, healing powers, etc.

I was not understanding this because I was not understanding that humility (as demonstrated on the example of Jesus Christ) can reach God, not just some of things of the world as I was only able to believe.

When Christ has come to the Earth He was teaching an idealist philosophy regarding human mind, not materialistic concept of brain. (At least, so it is delivered to us by the apostles.) Now I realize that this was not a must but his free choice. These two philosophies are just special cases of one more general philosophy.

So now I have the right to call myself a materialist, despite of I am a believer.

Renewal of spirit

As a result of broken head the link of the body and the spirit was lost. And if there are no link, there are no sense to speak about human's spirit. As such we now must follow Bible (which we were before refusing to follow saying that we are spirits) that people are flesh and blood. There are Spirit accordingly Bible, but isn't the concept of human spirit our own invention?

And what is the biblical way to serve God? In newness of spirit (Ro. 7:6) But now we have been discharged from the law, having died to that in which we were held; so that we serve in newness of the spirit, and not in oldness of the letter., that is being possessed every time by different spirits, no in human spirit. We were attempting to apply Gospel to our human self-identity, but it should instead be applied to the wind of spirit which blows through us.

Saying Gospel has ended I mean that, for example, the sense of Gospel is that all loses will be compensated but I was hit by head and if a subject becomes mad there are nobody whom to pay the compensation.

What the materialistic concept of human mind is? It is There are no human spirit, that is no mind independent from body. What the idealistic concept of human mind is? It is There are mind independent of the body (spirit).

These conception seems incompatible, but indeed there are a new concept which in a sense unites both materialistic and idealistic concepts of human mind. The composite concept is: Human spirit exists but it may change (be renewed, changed, replaced) during time (during man's life).

Accordingly the purely idealistic concept, when for example a man is hit by head it could not cause change in his inner character. So the idealistic concept was contradictory to the scientific data. In the new composite concept it is explained so: When human head is damaged it may cause replacement (or if damaged not very much strongly, partial replacement) of one spirit with an other spirit.

An analogy for this is a radio receiver. Breaking tuner can never damage the radio center, what radio receiver speaks is controlled by external radio center, but indeed damaging the receiver may damage what it speaks, for example may make it mad (possessed with demon) if as a result of the damage it mistakenly switches to a demonic radio channel.

With a man it is more complex because human body has its own mind and because human brain simultaneously hears more than one radio channel. A brain damage may break human character yet without complete replacement of the human person with an other person.

So called human spirit may be understood as the set of the channels which a man hears. Head damage may break tuning for some part of these channels so causing a partial change of the character. (Sometimes if the head is damaged very much it may cause complete change of the person, for example possession with a demon.)

A man despite of being in much degree controlled externally indeed has his own character. Above I have compared a man with radio receiver, but a more exact comparison would be with cell phone. When a speaker speaks by radio what he says (the character of the programme) depends only on the speaker, but when one speaks by cell phone what he says normally depends also on the receiver. When somebody speaks by cell phone with several different people, he normally makes special individual so to say radio programme for every individual hearer. Likewise the spirit makes his own individual programme for every man. Human spirit is just such a special individual radio programme for a particular man. Every such a programme may have its own special character (or sometimes several men have a common spirit), it is called spiritual character.

This programme may depend of the characteristics of human brain (just like as hat a cell phone speaker says depends on the character of the hearer) but is not determined by it. Normally the body's mind depends on the spirit not vice verse. Sin causes the reverse dependency when the human spirit depends on the body.

Human spirit itself resides in atmosphere and/or near outer space. The spirit of a man is developed (or degrading) during time by spiritual laws (a higher rank analog of the brain physiology) under influence of and contains (among of other information) spiritual record of such a lesson plan. This is one of the reasons why even if a man loses memory, his character often remains the same as he may be indeed controlled with the same spirit. Sometimes spirit may restore broken memory even if the body's memory is completely damaged by a serious trauma. Likewise sometimes a spirit of one man (either alive or dead) is transfered to an other man, in this case the second man sometimes may remember what was with the first.

Or else a man may be compared with a publically edited Web site (i.e. Wiki). Despite of such a site is edited externally by different writers, every site has its own character. Writers may change (some writers may die or cease to write and new writers may appear) but the character of site is not much changed by this, character of every aged Wiki site is established and normally does not change much. Just like it is with a man, who is edited by the spirit, by angels, and by God through Christ.

Why then rarely happen such things as transfer of spirit of one man to an other man like as it commonly happen with Web servers between which sites are freely moved? - a reasonable reader could ask. The reason of this is that man is severely broken by sin, a human brain is like a buggy Web server with broken connection. God has created men by a common standard, but now every man has his own individual set of deficiencies (deviations from the standard of righteousness), so it is hard to transfer software developed for one man to an other man as it is needed to deal with new problems. It is very hard to accomplish the transfer in such conditions. A spirit of one man may come (and remain long time) onto an other man only if the man in question has very correct character. For example, Bible says that the spirit of Elijah was transfered to Elisha when Elisha died (both men had very strong and correct character compared to most other people) and remained on him all his life, or the spirit of Moses has come onto 70 other men but remained on them only a short period of time. (Moses had the most stable character of all men (at least living in that time) but them not and they was not able to be Moses.)

This sin (that a man cannot keep other's spirit) however has also a positive consequence that every man has its own individual character, what makes people more valuable.

A man controlled by a spirit often perceives this spirit as his own (human) character. However sometimes (in the case when a man is controlled by several spirits which oppose to each other) a man feels it as an external influence which is again his will (practically against the will of the main spirit which controls him). It is just like as the Wiki site (or rather the community of editors) opposes when some external force (e.g. a spammer) attempts to control their site.

Note also that it is a well known scientific fact that man dies when he is isolated from the natural radio waves. This well agrees with Bible (Jam. 2:26) ... the body apart from the spirit is dead... So a man cannot live without spirit and human conscience is always in more or less degree controlled with a spirit (even if he emphasizes his brain and desires to not be under control of spirit, this desire is anyway in fact just a shadow of the desire of a spirit which controls this man).

Why then anyway we need the concept of human spirit if it changes during time? Why Jesus Christ was teaching an idealistic concept instead of materialistic concept which may seem more appropriate for this case? The answer is that the materialistic concept is simply wrong, there indeed are mind independent of human body, namely the mind of spirit (the mind of atmosphere and outer space plasma), this mind (the mind of spirit) influences the mind of human body (brain, etc.) and to say that a man is controlled simply by brain would be quite wrong. (For any who doubts that the spirit exists or that the atmosphere has a mind I witness that I myself have seen both ghosts and clouds taking reasonable forms more than a few times.)

Because I was reckoning myself high above other people, one of the primary purposes in my life was to preserve my spirit so that it would be not replaced with an other spirit. That is I was wanting to not become like other people. It has in much degree failed that is my personal characteristics (so to say characteristics of an almost righteous genius, such as patience, self-control, strong desire to do good, good memory, ability to quickly take right decisions, etc.) have changed very much, so that if I past would meet myself present I past would despise this man. But now renewal of spirit becomes the norm of the life, old preservation of human spirit anyway passes away.

Now I understand that my failure was necessary for success on the new level, namely for the end of gospel to happen. I have much failed in life accordingly Gospel but the unique success of bringing Gospel to the end is much greater.

Conclusion:

Move to the direction of atheism

Gospel says (He. 6:1) Therefore leaving the doctrine of the first principles of Christ, let us press on to perfection - not laying again a foundation... of faith toward God. Again means in the after-gospel age.

My understanding of this verse is: Faith in God should cease to be our foundation. It does not mean that we do not believe in existence of God, but that on this stage it ceased to be actual for us. As a simple example we cease to consider a man with the spiritual gift of curing as a vessel of the power of God but now consider him as a mere extrasense. As an other example we can consider Old Testament as an alien contact story instead of encounter with God as ancients were understanding this.

We lay aside the ancient religious concept of God and now consider God only when we encounter Him in the concrete form of the body of Christ (just like as atheists do except of that they refuse to believe that the body of Christ extends outside of the Earth more than to an inter-galaxy organization). In the New Testament age we have started to consider God through Christ, but now I deem we should more even cease to consider God in other forms during this stage.

At this stage I deem that we should instead of referring to wonders from God research concrete reasons of the wonderful events (for example inter-galaxy rays).

The reason for this is that for example I have severely failed attempting to analyze e.g. such things as forgiveness by God, sin, righteousness, etc. in particular concrete situations. The religion has lost the connection with human life. Instead now we may switch to analyzing particular things such as forgiveness of one man by an other, psychological problems, technologically correct behavior, etc. The reason of our failure was that we were insisting to operate with spiritual categories, while it has become so hard that we have ceased to be able to do this However some essential spiritual categories are yet left, such as end of Gospel, body of Christ, and some others.

(Ex. 20:7) You shall not take the name of Yahweh your God in vain, for Yahweh will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in vain. Now it is coming the time to start to fulfill this commandment.

Some particular issues

In New Testament women were a little lower than men, as were disallowed to speak in church and to teach, and married women were must be obedient to husbands in all, (Eph. 5:24) But as the assembly is subject to Christ, so let the wives also be to their own husbands in everything., (1Pe. 3:7) You husbands, in like manner, live with your wives according to knowledge, giving honor to the woman, as to the weaker vessel, as being also joint heirs of the grace of life; that your prayers may not be hindered. (This is in the Lord not in sin.) But now when the time of grace comes to the end, it is spoken about women being equal heirs of the grace (1Pe. 3:7); the word heirs implies covenant, so it is pertains to the end of New Covenant (Gospel), as accordingly Gospel (He. 9:16-17) 16 For where a last will and testament is, there must of necessity be the death of him who made it. 17 For a will is in force where there has been death, for it is never in force while he who made it lives. and death here should be understood as the end of the covenant. Note that the rest rights were already symmetric in New Testament. Well, anyway that is just a direct consequence of New Testament as it commands to obey to each other.

As I have already said, we do not nullify Gospel but we affirm Gospel. As before so also now wives should be obedient to husbands in all. But now is emphasized that both should be obedient to each other (Eph. 5:21) subjecting yourselves one to another in the fear of Christ., (1Pe. 5:5) ... Yes, all of you gird yourselves with humility, to subject yourselves to one another....

In New Testament we were slaves, slaves of God. But as Christ has said (Jn. 15:15) No longer do I call you servants, for the servant doesn't know what his lord does. But I have called you friends, for everything that I heard from my Father, I have made known to you.. Here the words I heard from my Father refer to that Christ was simply repeating the standard words of His Father rather than speaking Himself. Now God sets free from any religious ministry (except of our free choice, certainly).

May Apocalypse be canceled? It is addressed to slaves of God, (Re. 1:1) This is the Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his servants the things which must happen soon, which he sent and made known by his angel to his servant, John. But we are now friends of God, not slaves.

Do we need to live by faith anymore? Wasn't it only with the purpose to activate our thinking about the end of Gospel?

Probably flesh is described as lower than spirit only because the flesh is broken? Isn't spirit to be considered just as a temporal mean until flesh will be sanctified?

For example, it was once that I was so much sanctified and filled with power that the air around my head was shining with blue color. But at the same time my head was damaged. A guy has come to me and being very wondered asked why the air around my head shines. Then I said him that it is because I am a saint, but do not come near to me, as because my head is damaged I may go mad and kill, beat, or likewise. I have said that it is very strange but I am now both a saint and a maniac. I also said that if I would be not a saint then the wound of the head would certainly kill me or make me mad, I am alive because of supernatural power.

Now I also deem that Christ that is the end of law has come (However He has not yet come in glory and have not yet sit in human form on a throne in Jerusalem.), and as He has commanded to eat Eucharist (1Cor. 11:25-26) 25 In the same way he also took the cup, after supper, saying, This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink, in memory of me. 26 For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes., then Eucharist does not make sense anymore. It was pertaining only to the New Testament.

(Jn. 6:63-64) 63 It is the spirit who gives life. The flesh profits nothing. The words that I speak to you are spirit, and are life. 64 But there are some of you who don't believe. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were who didn't believe, and who it was who would betray him. This means that the hearers including the twelve apostles was not having any usefulness (profit) but only the words which Jesus was speaking indifferently to His hearers. But these who do not believe this (that not we ourselves are important but only the words of God which may come to our ears, are counted as betrayers.) What Jesus was saying about eternal life was not about eternal life of the hearers but that His words will live forever (either in spirits of hearers or somewhere else if they would not hear).

(Jn. 14:25) I have said these things to you, while still living with you. This also confirms that Christ just has incidentally happened to live with us, and was telling to us something by the way just while the driver was attempting to repair the ship.

(Jn. 16:28) ... Again, I leave the world, and go to the Father. Jesus repeats even again the course of His journey, it was not to come to the Earth but He was going to leave the World and go away.

Consider if the General Secretary of United Nations (?? It is a bad example, I just have not invented something better) would request to make and send him a thing. Then imagine that thousand fabrics would make this thing. Every fabric manager would mistaken, his gift was not needed as there were 999 other, but regarding the entire system it would be right that they have made it, as if they would not made it it would be missing. It is an often encountered case in mathematics, when every element is superfluous and can be eliminated but it is impossible to eliminate or decrease quantity of all elements as they are needed.

BTW, a similar situation is now in the software industry, where are made many duplicate products. The entire system is relatively right (the best we had to attain) but every competing producer is wrong.

Just likewise every our single act is sinful but the entire system of acts of God is right.

[Hm... A thought that God calls us to choose. What it would mean?]

(Jn. 14:24) He who doesn't love me doesn't keep my words. The word which you hear isn't mine, but the Father's who sent me.

(Jn. 14:27) Peace I leave with you. My peace I give to you; not as the world gives, give I to you. Don't let your heart be troubled, neither let it be fearful. tells what Christ leaves to us in the after New Testament period. It is peace. Our task now is to keep peace. Note that here the words not as the world gives means that these words of Jesus Christ extend after termination of New Testament, as the world here may be understood as the world of New Testament.

Now we see that (2Cor. 4:3-4) 3 Even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled in those who perish; 4 in whom the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not dawn on them. means that Gospel is the veil with which god of this world (that is God limited to the means of the World) has blinded the minds of the unbelieving... And this now means for us that we were limited by not knowing termination of the New Covenant.

We have eternal life, but it is artificial eternal life.

Do we need to be computers?

I once had lost ability to remember all and count faster than a computer which I had in certain time, and was in despair that I had become like other people, just like as a common man would be in despair if he would be transformed into a stupid and weak turtle (if turtle would be able to understand how pitiful it is compared with a man). But now after I has not only ceased to be a superman, but many times being tortured was losing even common human mind, thinking about my tortures has caused me to turn to realize that I was following a misconcept in anything. So it has turned that tortures had a purpose, to bring Gospel to its end.

Why New Testament has failed? In the past time people were living differently than now. They had no need to count much. In the modern technological civilization people need the ability to count quickly like a computer and to have ideal memory. In other words now we need to be transformed into computers. And as the next covenant will be built on better promises than the older (New Testament) the time when this will happen comes. Before the Fall to Sin Adam and Eve were surely able to count, they have lost this ability after eating the fruit. When Jesus Christ has come He has returned people lost mind but this does not necessarily mean that people after this was able to count like computers, Jesus Christ has given people a different kind of new mind than computer mind. Only a few people and only for a little periods of time were found to able to count in the past time. (For example I was a supercomputer a month or two and then have hanged. However this month was something like 30000 years of study, but I have forgotten the knowledge.) Now we feel ourselves unsaved again because we miss something now important what Adam had but we now miss, the ability to count. So now the New Testament has come to the end and we need to be saved again.

New Testament was: You are not broken, you can't do your old function but you can do a different function. God has taught us humility which includes that being unable to count we win in something other, better abstract thinking. This concept however has practically come to its actual end. We need to reckon. If we cannot, our attempt to consider ourselves clever is strained.

And certainly the Kingdom of God coming to the Earth will transform us to reliable and fast computers.

I do not like some others say that Gospel has become too ancient. It has not become too ancient. But it was with an inherent deficiency from the very beginning by its own essence.

Church of last days - the confusion about Gospel

It is also interesting to note the practical aspects of the church of the last day. The Gospel was repeatedly substituted with different conflicting with Gospel and with each other systems of principles either explicitly formulated or unconscious. Everybody of us was saying There are a problem but no one of us was able to formulate what is the problem. We were fighting so called spiritual war for peace and doing a bunch of other silly things. (He. 8:13) In that he says, A new covenant, he has made the first old. But that which is becoming old and grows aged is near to vanishing away. We were simply seeing that New Testament for us becomes old and grows aged, but were refusing to believe New Testament itself that it is vanishing away.

Having following Gospel we were seeking a problem inside ourselves, and it was inside ourselves, it was our fail attempt to follow Gospel.

What remains from Gospel

(1Cor. 13:13) But now faith, hope, and love remain-these three. The greatest of these is love. That is three things remains from the Gospel, faith that it is true (not false), hope for good things spoken in Gospel (for example, we take in account possibility to have eternal life), and love which was developed under the Gospel. It is the result of Gospel, what it should produce and what should remain after it has accomplished its function.

(Jn. 15:16) ... I... appointed you, that you should go and bear fruit, and that your fruit should remain... This means that the productive (fruitful) things which was in the stage of Gospel as well as results of our deals should be got into the next stage.

Paul's epistles as a result of miscommunication

It is very noticeable for me that the letters of St. Paul are written as a result of communication of a man with alien(s) (probably with galaxies) with great mis-understanding of each other. It is just like a man speaking with a computer. Gospel is indeed true and it was and is Word of God, but this is the way how it was delivered, and this way is somehow comic now when I understand this.

Paul was simply in an inter-galaxy chat.

Some example quite comic quotes from Gospel:

Misc notes

Interesting to note that in the last month of my attempts to live accordingly Gospel my brain has become magnetic and the magnetic field of the brain has so to say walked outside of the head. I had several little brain traumas being magnetized with metallic things which were near my head. I conclude that the number of the connections of my ideas was too big so that the place inside of my head was not enough and the connections between neurones were going outside. The ideas were literally not having enough place in my head. It is similar with a problem which electronic engineers have that the number of connections between transistors of a microchip tends to become so big that they have a difficulty to find place for all wires. As now know human brain has a solution for this that the connections which have not enough place inside the head may go outside in the form of magnetic field but this solution has the deficiency that the magnetic field hooks with metallic things and this may lead to a damage of the brain.

(Jn. 16:8-12) 8 When he [the spirit of truth] has come, he will convict the world about sin, about righteousness, and about judgment; 9 about sin, because they don't believe in me; 10 about righteousness, because I am going to my Father, and you won't see me any more; 11 about judgment, because the prince of this world has been judged. 12 I have yet many things to tell you, but you can't bear them now. That the prince of this world is condemned means that who will be condemned is our past life in ignorance when we attempted to live accordingly Gospel. About sin that do not believe Me means that we were ignoring the real personality of Christ completely substituting it with the official representative described in Gospel. About righteousness that I go to My Father means that Christ has come to the Earth by mistake, while He was traveling to an other direction, to His Father what is the right direction and His remaining here would be wrong.

The essence of what I say is that notwithstanding that there are no contradictions in the Gospel, Gospel has come very near to contradiction.

Gospel is good news. This is the last good news, that good news had ended. Accordingly truth it also should be said in gospel.

New Testament was reliably locked for 2000 years by its name. If one could attempt to switch to an other testament, he could call the other testament the new testament and fail because the name is already taken. So then the next after Old Testament and New Testament is Next Testament or Future Testament. And it pertains not to the present but to the future. We are entering to the age of the Next Testament which follows after New Testament but the Next Testament is not yet ratified but is reserved for the future, forever. So what is now is what the Next Testament is not. In the present we have laying aside various covenants and testaments as concluded of the New Testament.

As the end of the law is Christ (Ro. 10:4), then the end of Gospel is God the Father. This is clear from the words of Christ (Jn. 14:12) ... I am going to my Father.. These words specify where Christ (in the form of a gospel) go and where is the end of the way of the Gospel. So in the age of Gospel we were receiving knowledge (primarily) about Christ, in the Next Age we are to know the Father primarily not as before only in Christ.

It is said (Rev. 20:4, 6; 1Cor. 15:24-25) that Christ will rule 1000 years and then will give over the authority to the Father. This means that yet 1000 years the Gospel will continue. During this period we will be knowing that we hear only good news and miss the rest information. In this we will be similar to a population of a total country from which the information is hidden. But it will be different that we unlike citizens of human total systems will be openly knowing that to us are said only good news and the rest information is hidden. Moreover accordingly the words of Jesus (Mt. 7:7-8) 7 ... Seek, and you will find... 8 For everyone... who seeks finds. and Lk. 11:9-10 we will be able to find the information.

So where Gospel is not applicable? Gospel is not applicable to anything in the world. Gospel is not applicable to itself (to Gospel). (Gal. 2:19) By the law I died for the law. Simply, Gospel can deal with any problem except of these problems which arise out of Gospel itself (problems caused by Gospel). Above as an example for this I have shown that Gospel cannot deal with problems of an apostle, it is because apostles are pertaining to Gospel, but Gospel fails dealing with problems pertaining to Gospel itself. (Jam. 4:11-12) 11 ... He who speaks against a brother and judges his brother, speaks against the law and judges the law. But if you judge the law, you are not a doer of the law, but a judge. Here the law spiritually means gospel, so gospel is found unable to deal with conflicts of the brother (fellow priests which attempt to lead each other to pasture instead of the sheep).

Last words

Some Bible quotes as the epilogue of this article:

(Jn. 14:1) Don't let your heart be troubled. Believe in God. Believe also in me.

Copyright © 2004-2005 Victor Porton. All rights reserved.